Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux
De : arne (at) *nospam* vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 28. Nov 2024, 19:24:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <viacgn$kv9u$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/28/2024 3:39 AM, Matthew R. Wilson wrote:
But ESXi just works. It's solid, it has a huge infrastructure around it
for vSAN stuff, virtual networking management, vMotion "just works," I
find the management interface nicer than, say, Proxmox (although Proxmox
is an impressive product), etc.
 It's sad to see Broadcom is going to do everything they can to drive
away the VMWare customer base. VMWare will lose its market-leader
position, FAR fewer people will learn about it and experiment with it
since Broadcom killed the no-cost ESXi licenses, and popularity of
Proxmox is going to skyrocket, I suspect. Which isn't a bad thing --
when open source solutions get attention and traction, they continue to
improve, and as I said earlier, Proxmox is already an impressive product
so I look forward to its future.
 But make no mistake: VMWare was -- and I'd say still is -- the gold
standard for virtualization, both on the server (ESXi) and the
workstation (VMWare Workstation). VMWare's downfall at the hands of
Broadcom will 100% be due to Broadcom's business practices, not
technology.
I don't think the Broadcom prices hike will start ESXi
decline - I think it will accelerate it.
Even before the acquisition and price hike, then ESXi
was heading for decline.
Some years ago then VM's in advanced setups was
what the vast majority of enterprise IT used. And
MS fanatics choose Hyper-V, Linux fanatics choose
KVM, but the majority choose ESXi. So ESXi market
share was huge and VMWare was making good money.
But that is not how the enterprise IT world
look today. Today there are 3 possible setups:
1) public cloud
2) on-prem with containers either on bare metal
    or on VM in very basic setup (because k8s and
    other container stuff provide all the advanced functionality)
3) on-prem with traditional VM's
#1 is not ESXi as the big cloud vendors do not want
to pay and they want to customize. #2 does not need to
be ESXi as no advanced features are needed so any
virtualization is OK and ESXi cost. #3 is all that
is left for ESXi to shine with its advanced features.
So even before price hikes then ESXi was headed towards only
legacy systems and on-prem stateful application that even
though they can be deployed in k8s doesn't really
lean themselves to it in the same was as stateless
applications.
Arne

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Nov 24 * VMWARE/ESXi Linux51David Turner
27 Nov 24 +- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Robert A. Brooks
27 Nov 24 +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux38Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Nov 24 i`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux37John Dallman
28 Nov 24 i `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux36Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Nov 24 i  `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux35Matthew R. Wilson
28 Nov 24 i   +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux10Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i   i`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux9Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i   i +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux7Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i   i i+* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux4Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i   i ii`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux3Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i   i ii `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i   i ii  `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i   i i`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Dennis Boone
3 Dec 24 i   i i `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i   i `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Nov 24 i   +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
28 Nov 24 i   i`- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1John Dallman
28 Nov 24 i   +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Nov 24 i   i+- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1John Dallman
29 Nov 24 i   i`- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i   `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux19Waldek Hebisch
3 Dec 24 i    +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24 i    i`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux14Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i    i +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux5Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i    i i`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux4Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i    i i `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux3Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i    i i  `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i    i i   `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dan Cross
3 Dec 24 i    i +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Dec 24 i    i i`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux6Arne Vajhøj
4 Dec 24 i    i i `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux5Dan Cross
4 Dec 24 i    i i  +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
4 Dec 24 i    i i  i`- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dan Cross
4 Dec 24 i    i i  `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
4 Dec 24 i    i i   `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dan Cross
4 Dec 24 i    i `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dave Froble
3 Dec 24 i    +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i    i`- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Arne Vajhøj
3 Dec 24 i    `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dan Cross
28 Nov 24 +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
28 Nov 24 i`- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Nov 24 +- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Gcalliet
2 Dec 24 `* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Dec 24  +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux6John Dallman
4 Dec 24  i`* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux5Simon Clubley
4 Dec 24  i +- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Simon Clubley
4 Dec 24  i +* Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux2Arne Vajhøj
5 Dec 24  i i`- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Simon Clubley
6 Dec 24  i `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Dave Froble
3 Dec 24  `- Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux1Arne Vajhøj

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal