Sujet : Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux
De : cross (at) *nospam* spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 03. Dec 2024, 16:36:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <vin8ih$ntd$2@reader2.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
vin597$3sjr$2@dont-email.me>,
Arne Vajhøj <
arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
On 12/2/2024 11:57 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 03:09:15 -0000 (UTC), Waldek Hebisch wrote:
From what you wrote seem that ESXi is more similar to Xen than to
KVM+qemu, that is ESXi and Xen discourage running unvirtualized programs
while in KVM+qemu some (frequently most) programs is running
unvirtualized and only rest is virtualized.
I think that dates back to the old distinction between “type 1” and “type
2“ hypervisors. It’s an obsolete distinction nowadays.
>
No.
>
If you look at what is available and what it is used for then you will
see that what is labeled type 1 is used for production and what is
labeled type 2 is used for development. It matters.
No, that has nothing to do with it.
- Dan C.
VMWARE/ESXi Linux
Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux
