Sujet : Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux
De : davef (at) *nospam* tsoft-inc.com (Dave Froble)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 04. Dec 2024, 05:01:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <viok3v$l0un$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 12/3/2024 9:40 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 12/2/2024 11:57 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 03:09:15 -0000 (UTC), Waldek Hebisch wrote:
From what you wrote seem that ESXi is more similar to Xen than to
KVM+qemu, that is ESXi and Xen discourage running unvirtualized programs
while in KVM+qemu some (frequently most) programs is running
unvirtualized and only rest is virtualized.
>
I think that dates back to the old distinction between “type 1” and “type
2“ hypervisors. It’s an obsolete distinction nowadays.
>
No.
>
If you look at what is available and what it is used for then you will
see that what is labeled type 1 is used for production and what is
labeled type 2 is used for development. It matters.
>
Arne
>
Is that a hard rule? I doubt it.
Though, some may feel that the "type 1" (whatever that really is, or matters) might be a bit safer ...
-- David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.comDFE Ultralights, Inc.170 Grimplin RoadVanderbilt, PA 15486