Sujet : Re: Local Versus Global Command Options
De : davef (at) *nospam* tsoft-inc.com (Dave Froble)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 22. Feb 2025, 06:47:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpboct$3r1ga$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 2/21/2025 5:18 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:42:56 -0500, Stephen Hoffman wrote:
>
Is it feasible for DCL? Sure. Though it'll likely involve passing some
of the syntax to lib$table_parse or ilk for parsing, as do a few DCL
commands I've encountered (or have written) over the years.
>
What happens when you bypass DCL? So one program directly spawns another
and gives it a command to execute. Can the receiving program behave the
same in that case as if it were invoked from a shell?
>
Well, that depends upon the requirements and design, right?
I've done quite a bit of such, but, I never depended on some set design, never even considered it, I designed what I needed and implemented it.
Don't know why anyone would ever do anything else ??????
-- David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.comDFE Ultralights, Inc.170 Grimplin RoadVanderbilt, PA 15486
Local Versus Global Command Options
Re: Local Versus Global Command Options