Re: ISO: The Eiffel OO programming language and IDE, on VMS

On 3/26/2025 8:54 AM, gcalliet wrote:

Le 26/03/2025 à 13:02, Arne Vajhøj a écrit :

On 3/26/2025 1:09 AM, David Meyer wrote:

Is there anything in the VSI licensing that would prevent a community of
VMS and Rust (for example) fans from developing a VMS port of a Rust
compiler and releasing the compiler as open source?

>
No.
>
VMS users can write or port all the compilers they want to. And
they have done so in the past: old versions of GCC C and C++ ran on
VMS VAX and VMS Alpha, old versions of Gnat Ada ran on VMS Alpha
and VMS Itanium.
>
The reason it is not happening is not license restrictions, but
lack of interest (willing to do work type of interest - not
it would be nice if somebody else did the work interest) in
the VMS community.
>
The specific discussion was about the LLVM compiler backend,
that VSI use for their compilers. If VSI made that available
(it is open source) then it would be easier for people to
write or port new compilers using LLVM as backend.

 >

It's the most important point.

Note: this is pure speculation - I have no idea about
what VSI actually thinks about the topic.
It is obvious that VSI will need to upgrade LLVM several
times within the next 10-20-30 years. It is obvious (to me
at least) that it does not make sense for VSI to re-port aka
re-apply changes every time they take a new cut - it makes
sense to get the VMS changes into the upstream product to
make LLVM upgrades much easier. So when Intel & AMD
release AVX-8192 in 2034, then LLVM add support for that,
VSI grab the latest LLVM and the VMS compilers support it.
It has to happen.
But things does not happen by magic - they happen due to
hard work. It takes effort to setup a usable public
Github repo (usuable = no dependency on VSI internal build
environment) and it takes effort to get open source changes
into an upstream project. And VSI compiler team is not a 1000
man team. So they prioritize.
I suspect that if projects to write/port native compilers
based on LLVM (for languages not supported by VSI) to VMS
started to materialize, then that could help push the
VMS LLVM release up the priority list.
Arne