Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On 4/8/2025 1:27 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:On 2025-04-08, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:>On 4/8/2025 8:20 AM, Simon Clubley wrote:>>
It's a lot more complicated than that.
>
For example, take a LL(1) RD parser. Even ignoring the processing
of the results from the parser, how much code (and how much effort)
do you think it would take to implement it in Macro-32 compared to C ?
Still not obvious to me that it would not follow normal LOC/FP
ratios.
Try implementing one, especially with a reasonably sized grammar, and
you will very rapidly understand that it is not as simple as you seem
to think it is. :-)
I have not made any claim about it being simple.
>
I have made a claim that the ratio for LOC/FP for Macro-32
and LOC/FP for C for such a problem would not be significantly
different from other application types.
>
>Effort is a different issue. If someone said:
>
x1.6 LOC
x16 hours for initial write of code
x160 hours for maintenance of code
>
then I would consider it likely.
>
It has been hinted a few time that the DCL code is not easy to
understand and modify.
>
As I mentioned above, this is no longer about DCL. I picked the above
standalone example, a LL(1) RD parser, because it's a really good example
of the different scale of effort involved in writing it in Macro-32
instead of in C.
I have not made any claim about effort either.
>
Are you sure that you have understood the topic??
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.