Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base
De : antispam (at) *nospam* fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 19. Apr 2025, 14:25:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <vu0883$2q331$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.1.0-9-amd64 (x86_64))
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:56:17 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
 
If we discuss what is the "right" answer, then I would actually say 2.
 
for i := 1 to 10 do writeln(i)
 
for i := 1 to 10 do
    writeln(i)
 
for i := 1 to 10 do begin
    writeln(i)
end;
 
for i := 1 to 10 do begin
    writeln(i)
end;
 
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++) printf("%d\n", i);
 
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
     printf("%d\n", i);
 
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
     printf("%d\n", i);
}
 
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
{
     printf("%d\n", i);
}
 
I would say 2 for all.
 
How much difference would such distinctions make in real-world code,
anyway? I suspect not much. Longer compound statements would dominate
shorter ones in the line count.

I would expect about 20% difference.  I saw a case when lead developer
thought that code is "takes too much vertical space" and spent
substantial effort to reformat it.  IIRC on files having few thousends
lines he made files shorter by about 10-15%.  IIRC he changed code
formatting, keeping comments mostly as-is.  Also, he worked within
mandated GNU brace placement rule, theoretically files could be
shortened more by switching to more compact brace placement rule.

--
                              Waldek Hebisch

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * Clair Grant on VMS code base55Arne Vajhøj
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base5Dan Cross
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base4Arne Vajhøj
1 Apr 25 i +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Apr 25 i  `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
3 Apr 25 `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base49Simon Clubley
3 Apr 25  +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base45Arne Vajhøj
4 Apr 25  i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base44Simon Clubley
4 Apr 25  i +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Rich Alderson
7 Apr 25  i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base42Arne Vajhøj
7 Apr 25  i  +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
7 Apr 25  i  +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Apr 25  i  i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Apr 25  i  i `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
8 Apr 25  i  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base37Simon Clubley
8 Apr 25  i   `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base36Arne Vajhøj
8 Apr 25  i    +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1abrsvc
8 Apr 25  i    `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base34Simon Clubley
11 Apr 25  i     `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base33Arne Vajhøj
11 Apr 25  i      +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
14 Apr 25  i      `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base31Simon Clubley
14 Apr 25  i       `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base30Dave Froble
14 Apr 25  i        +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Simon Clubley
16 Apr 25  i        i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Dave Froble
17 Apr 25  i        i `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
16 Apr 25  i        `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base26Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i         `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base25Dan Cross
17 Apr 25  i          +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base18bill
17 Apr 25  i          i+* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base6Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          ii`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base5bill
17 Apr 25  i          ii +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          ii `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Simon Clubley
17 Apr 25  i          ii  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2bill
17 Apr 25  i          ii   `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Simon Clubley
17 Apr 25  i          i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base11Simon Clubley
17 Apr 25  i          i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base10Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          i  +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base4bill
17 Apr 25  i          i  i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          i  i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2bill
17 Apr 25  i          i  i  `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
18 Apr 25  i          i  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Apr 25  i          i   +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Arne Vajhøj
18 Apr 25  i          i   i+- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Apr 25  i          i   i`- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Waldek Hebisch
19 Apr 25  i          i   `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Waldek Hebisch
17 Apr 25  i          +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base4Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Dan Cross
18 Apr 25  i          i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Dave Froble
18 Apr 25  i          i  `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
17 Apr 25  i          `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i           `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
9 Apr 25  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3John Reagan
9 Apr 25   `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Apr 25    `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal