Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base
De : antispam (at) *nospam* fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 19. Apr 2025, 14:29:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <vu08fq$2q331$2@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.1.0-9-amd64 (x86_64))
Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
On 4/17/2025 7:26 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:56:17 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
If we discuss what is the "right" answer, then I would actually say 2.
>
for i := 1 to 10 do writeln(i)
>
for i := 1 to 10 do
     writeln(i)
>
for i := 1 to 10 do begin
     writeln(i)
end;
>
for i := 1 to 10 do begin
     writeln(i)
end;
>
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++) printf("%d\n", i);
>
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
      printf("%d\n", i);
>
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
      printf("%d\n", i);
}
>
for(i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
{
      printf("%d\n", i);
}
>
I would say 2 for all.
 
How much difference would such distinctions make in real-world code,
anyway? I suspect not much. Longer compound statements would dominate
shorter ones in the line count.
 
It is all based on averages.
 
If person X write a tiny program and person Y write a the
same tiny program, then the non-blank and non-comment line
count may vary a lot.
 
But if a team of a 100 developers write an application close to
one million lines of code and another team of another 100 developers
write the same application, then  then the non-blank and
non-comment line count will be relative close.

I would expect 1M loc prohect to have rater strict code style rules.
Individual differences between programmers should average out,
but difference due to rule books will stay.

--
                              Waldek Hebisch

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * Clair Grant on VMS code base55Arne Vajhøj
1 Apr 25 +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base5Dan Cross
1 Apr 25 i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base4Arne Vajhøj
1 Apr 25 i +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
1 Apr 25 i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Apr 25 i  `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
3 Apr 25 `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base49Simon Clubley
3 Apr 25  +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base45Arne Vajhøj
4 Apr 25  i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base44Simon Clubley
4 Apr 25  i +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Rich Alderson
7 Apr 25  i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base42Arne Vajhøj
7 Apr 25  i  +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
7 Apr 25  i  +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Apr 25  i  i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Apr 25  i  i `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
8 Apr 25  i  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base37Simon Clubley
8 Apr 25  i   `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base36Arne Vajhøj
8 Apr 25  i    +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1abrsvc
8 Apr 25  i    `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base34Simon Clubley
11 Apr 25  i     `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base33Arne Vajhøj
11 Apr 25  i      +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
14 Apr 25  i      `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base31Simon Clubley
14 Apr 25  i       `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base30Dave Froble
14 Apr 25  i        +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Simon Clubley
16 Apr 25  i        i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Dave Froble
17 Apr 25  i        i `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
16 Apr 25  i        `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base26Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i         `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base25Dan Cross
17 Apr 25  i          +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base18bill
17 Apr 25  i          i+* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base6Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          ii`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base5bill
17 Apr 25  i          ii +- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          ii `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Simon Clubley
17 Apr 25  i          ii  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2bill
17 Apr 25  i          ii   `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Simon Clubley
17 Apr 25  i          i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base11Simon Clubley
17 Apr 25  i          i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base10Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          i  +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base4bill
17 Apr 25  i          i  i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          i  i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2bill
17 Apr 25  i          i  i  `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj
18 Apr 25  i          i  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Apr 25  i          i   +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Arne Vajhøj
18 Apr 25  i          i   i+- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Apr 25  i          i   i`- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Waldek Hebisch
19 Apr 25  i          i   `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Waldek Hebisch
17 Apr 25  i          +* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base4Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i          i`* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3Dan Cross
18 Apr 25  i          i `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Dave Froble
18 Apr 25  i          i  `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
17 Apr 25  i          `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Arne Vajhøj
17 Apr 25  i           `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Dan Cross
9 Apr 25  `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base3John Reagan
9 Apr 25   `* Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Apr 25    `- Re: Clair Grant on VMS code base1Arne Vajhøj

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal