Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 10:01:17 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:Linux and FreeBSD/OpenBSD/NetBSD projects are really not that different.GPL/AGPL is less business friendly than Apache/MIT/BSD on the softwareFunny you should say that. Leaving aside the AGPL for a moment, I have
consumer side.
>
But GPL/AGPL is more business friendly than Apache/MIT/BSD on the
software producer side.
heard lots of people say that copyleft licences are not somehow “business-
friendly”. What they are is “competition-friendly”: they ensure that
market participants compete on a level playing field.
Remember that, in Free Software, there is not this hard-and-fast
distinction between those who “produce” it and those who “consume” it.
Sheer numbers of passive users do not, on their own, make much difference
to the success of a Free Software project. What matters is the liveliness
of the community that contributes back to the project.
And this is where copyleft comes in. Businesses are notorious for wanting
to take without giving back. Consider the difference between the BSD and
Linux worlds: one remains anaemic and relegated to the fringe, weighed
down by freeloaders who keep sucking the lifeblood from the community,
while the other continues to thrive and grow, even as it has come to
dominate the entire computing landscape.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.