Re: Bootcamp

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Bootcamp
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 04. Jul 2025, 02:40:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1047bef$fa7s$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 20:56:29 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

After 31 years of work, then Wine is pretty good. But I don't think
anyone would call it 100% compatible.

Like I said, good enough to use as the basis for a shipping, commercially-
successful product -- one that has the Windows-based competitors choking
in its dust, even.

We don’t need to emulate the internals of DCL. We just need to be able
to run users’ command procedures.
 
The issue is that the internals is reflected in the semantics. It
becomes messy.

What do we need? The DCL emulator can run in a separate process from the
user program. When the user hits CTRL/C or CTRL/Y, the DCL process issues
a SIGSTOP to the user-program process. All handling of supervisor-mode-
stuff is emulated by sending requests to the DCL process.

Do you begin to see how it could work?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 25 * Bootcamp51Arne Vajhøj
21 May 25 +* Re: Bootcamp5Robert A. Brooks
21 May 25 i+* Re: Bootcamp2David Meyer
22 May 25 ii`- Re: Bootcamp1Subcommandante XDelta
23 May 25 i+- Re: Bootcamp1Stephen Hoffman
3 Jun 25 i`- Re: Bootcamp1Arne Vajhøj
3 Jun 25 +* Re: Bootcamp4Arne Vajhøj
6 Jun 25 i`* Re: Bootcamp3Craig A. Berry
6 Jun 25 i `* Re: Bootcamp2Arne Vajhøj
6 Jun 25 i  `- Re: Bootcamp1Craig A. Berry
7 Jun 25 `* Re: Bootcamp41Subcommandante XDelta
7 Jun 25  +* Re: Bootcamp17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jun 25  i`* Re: Bootcamp16Arne Vajhøj
9 Jun 25  i `* Re: Bootcamp15Simon Clubley
9 Jun 25  i  +- Re: Bootcamp1Simon Clubley
9 Jun 25  i  +* Re: Bootcamp8Dan Cross
9 Jun 25  i  i+* Re: Bootcamp2Simon Clubley
9 Jun 25  i  ii`- Re: Bootcamp1Dan Cross
9 Jun 25  i  i`* Re: Bootcamp5Arne Vajhøj
9 Jun 25  i  i +- Re: Bootcamp1Dan Cross
9 Jun 25  i  i +* Re: Bootcamp2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Jun 25  i  i i`- Re: Bootcamp1Arne Vajhøj
10 Jun 25  i  i `- Re: Bootcamp1Simon Clubley
9 Jun 25  i  `* Re: Bootcamp5Arne Vajhøj
9 Jun 25  i   +* Re: Bootcamp2Robert A. Brooks
9 Jun 25  i   i`- Re: Bootcamp1Arne Vajhøj
9 Jun 25  i   +- Re: Bootcamp1Chris Townley
10 Jun 25  i   `- Re: Bootcamp1Simon Clubley
1 Jul 25  `* Re: Bootcamp23gcalliet
1 Jul 25   +* Re: Bootcamp4Simon Clubley
2 Jul 25   i`* Re: Bootcamp3gcalliet
2 Jul 25   i +- Re: Bootcamp1Arne Vajhøj
2 Jul 25   i `- Re: Bootcamp1Simon Clubley
2 Jul 25   `* Re: Bootcamp18Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jul 25    `* Re: Bootcamp17gcalliet
3 Jul 25     `* Re: Bootcamp16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jul 25      `* Re: Bootcamp15Arne Vajhøj
3 Jul 25       +* Re: Bootcamp3Dan Cross
3 Jul20:14       i`* OS emulation [was Re: Bootcamp]2Rich Alderson
3 Jul21:32       i `- Re: OS emulation [was Re: Bootcamp]1Dan Cross
3 Jul 25       +* Re: Bootcamp2bill
3 Jul 25       i`- Re: Bootcamp1Chris Townley
3 Jul23:39       `* Re: Bootcamp9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jul01:56        +* Re: Bootcamp2Arne Vajhøj
4 Jul02:40        i`- Re: Bootcamp1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul01:36        `* Re: Bootcamp6Waldek Hebisch
6 Jul04:22         +* Re: Bootcamp4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul13:52         i`* Re: Bootcamp3Waldek Hebisch
6 Jul16:04         i +- Re: Bootcamp1bill
6 Jul22:38         i `- Re: Bootcamp1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul16:02         `- Re: Bootcamp1bill

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal