Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?
De : arne (at) *nospam* vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 01. Jun 2026, 23:58:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10vl2qj$2i6gp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/1/2026 5:08 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 6/1/2026 3:15 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
It's an 8.5 Arne. :-) That's not a process crash. That's a confirmed
exploitable vulnerability. (At least on Alpha/x86-64).
 You can speculate about Itanium being different. But I have not
seen anything in what VSI has published that indicate Itanium is
different from this one.
Which is not true.
The VSI CVE page actually say they are different and do explain
more about the problem:
<quote>
An issue was discovered in OpenVMS V8.4 through V8.4-2L2 on Alpha, V8.4 through V8.4-2L3 on IA64, and through V9.2-3 on x86. Passing a long string value to the F$CUNITS lexical function may result in a buffer overflow allowing a local privilege escalation when a non-privileged account enters a crafted command line. This bug is exploitable on Alpha and x86 and may cause a process crash on IA64. Software was affected regardless of whether it was directly shipped by VMS Software, Inc. (VSI), HPE, or HP.
</quote>
Arne

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jun 26 * Was Itanium a safer architecture ?44Simon Clubley
1 Jun 26 +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?6Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?5Simon Clubley
1 Jun 26 i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?4Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 i  `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?3Simon Clubley
1 Jun 26 i   `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?2Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 i    `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?35Scott Dorsey
2 Jun 26 i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?34Simon Clubley
2 Jun 26 i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?33Dan Cross
3 Jun 26 i  `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?32Simon Clubley
4 Jun 26 i   `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?31John Dallman
4 Jun 26 i    +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?26Simon Clubley
4 Jun 26 i    i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?25John Dallman
4 Jun 26 i    i +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
5 Jun 26 i    i +* Making a safer ecosystem12Simon Clubley
8 Jun 26 i    i i+* Re: Making a safer ecosystem10Dan Cross
9 Jun 26 i    i ii`* Re: Making a safer ecosystem9Simon Clubley
10 Jun 26 i    i ii `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem8Dan Cross
11 Jun 26 i    i ii  `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem7Simon Clubley
13 Jun 26 i    i ii   `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem6Dan Cross
16 Jun 26 i    i ii    `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem5Simon Clubley
19 Jun 26 i    i ii     +* Re: Making a safer ecosystem2Dan Cross
23 Jun 26 i    i ii     i`- Re: Making a safer ecosystem1Simon Clubley
19 Jun 26 i    i ii     `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem2Waldek Hebisch
23 Jun 26 i    i ii      `- Re: Making a safer ecosystem1Simon Clubley
13 Jun 26 i    i i`- Re: Making a safer ecosystem1Stephen Hoffman
5 Jun 26 i    i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?11Scott Dorsey
6 Jun 26 i    i  +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?9bill
6 Jun 26 i    i  i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?8Scott Dorsey
6 Jun 26 i    i  i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?7bill
6 Jun 26 i    i  i  +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Scott Dorsey
8 Jun 26 i    i  i  `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?5Dan Cross
10 Jun 26 i    i  i   `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?4bill
10 Jun 26 i    i  i    `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?3Dan Cross
11 Jun 26 i    i  i     `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?2Simon Clubley
13 Jun 26 i    i  i      `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Dan Cross
8 Jun 26 i    i  `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Dan Cross
8 Jun 26 i    `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?4Dan Cross
8 Jun 26 i     `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?3John Dallman
8 Jun 26 i      +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Simon Clubley
9 Jun 26 i      `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
1 Jun 26 +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Michael S
1 Jun 26 `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Dan Cross

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal