Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D’Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 04. Jun 2026, 23:47:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10vsva7$nejc$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.165 (Kostiantynivka)
On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 20:03 +0100 (BST), John Dallman wrote:

The military have brute-force answers to that, via air gaps, but
nobody want to buy such systems. Few are willing to pay for any
security overheads.

And the discipline to use them. The military takes that sort of
regulatory environment for granted, ordinary civilians not so much.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jun 26 * Was Itanium a safer architecture ?44Simon Clubley
1 Jun 26 +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?6Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?5Simon Clubley
1 Jun 26 i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?4Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 i  `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?3Simon Clubley
1 Jun 26 i   `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?2Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 i    `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Arne Vajhøj
1 Jun 26 +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?35Scott Dorsey
2 Jun 26 i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?34Simon Clubley
2 Jun 26 i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?33Dan Cross
3 Jun 26 i  `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?32Simon Clubley
4 Jun 26 i   `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?31John Dallman
4 Jun 26 i    +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?26Simon Clubley
4 Jun 26 i    i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?25John Dallman
4 Jun 26 i    i +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
5 Jun 26 i    i +* Making a safer ecosystem12Simon Clubley
8 Jun 26 i    i i+* Re: Making a safer ecosystem10Dan Cross
9 Jun 26 i    i ii`* Re: Making a safer ecosystem9Simon Clubley
10 Jun 26 i    i ii `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem8Dan Cross
11 Jun 26 i    i ii  `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem7Simon Clubley
13 Jun 26 i    i ii   `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem6Dan Cross
16 Jun 26 i    i ii    `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem5Simon Clubley
19 Jun 26 i    i ii     +* Re: Making a safer ecosystem2Dan Cross
23 Jun 26 i    i ii     i`- Re: Making a safer ecosystem1Simon Clubley
19 Jun 26 i    i ii     `* Re: Making a safer ecosystem2Waldek Hebisch
23 Jun 26 i    i ii      `- Re: Making a safer ecosystem1Simon Clubley
13 Jun 26 i    i i`- Re: Making a safer ecosystem1Stephen Hoffman
5 Jun 26 i    i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?11Scott Dorsey
6 Jun 26 i    i  +* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?9bill
6 Jun 26 i    i  i`* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?8Scott Dorsey
6 Jun 26 i    i  i `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?7bill
6 Jun 26 i    i  i  +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Scott Dorsey
8 Jun 26 i    i  i  `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?5Dan Cross
10 Jun 26 i    i  i   `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?4bill
10 Jun 26 i    i  i    `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?3Dan Cross
11 Jun 26 i    i  i     `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?2Simon Clubley
13 Jun 26 i    i  i      `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Dan Cross
8 Jun 26 i    i  `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Dan Cross
8 Jun 26 i    `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?4Dan Cross
8 Jun 26 i     `* Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?3John Dallman
8 Jun 26 i      +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Simon Clubley
9 Jun 26 i      `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Lawrence D’Oliveiro
1 Jun 26 +- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Michael S
1 Jun 26 `- Re: Was Itanium a safer architecture ?1Dan Cross

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal