Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c programming 
Sujet : Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : comp.programming
Date : 18. Jun 2025, 07:40:17
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <A8ydnRw2VJ7_ws_1nZ2dnZfqnPjzVQAA@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 5/22/25 2:51 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I think most of this article is a load of nonsense, myself.
 <https://www.infoworld.com/article/3990923/booleans-considered-harmful.html>
 Thoughts?
   Late note - absolutely NOTHING wrong with boolean
   conditions. EASY to set up simple logic trees
   using them.
   I wonder the MOTIVES of those who say they're bad.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 May 25 * “Booleans Considered Harmful”13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 25 +* Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”4Julio Di Egidio
22 May 25 i+- Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”1Julio Di Egidio
22 May 25 i`* Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 25 i `- Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”1Julio Di Egidio
22 May 25 +* Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”3David Brown
22 May 25 i`* Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”2Julio Di Egidio
22 May 25 i `- Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”1Julio Di Egidio
22 May 25 +- Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”1Keith Thompson
23 May 25 +* Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”2JJ
23 May 25 i`- Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 25 +- Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 25 `- Re: “Booleans Considered Harmful”1c186282

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal