Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg action 
Sujet : Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"
De : zaghadka (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zaghadka)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Date : 21. Mar 2025, 23:09:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : E. Nygma & Sons, LLC
Message-ID : <3mortj1qt0k5cfoms3d8ojj7tvd91tpcja@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:03:56 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

The big-name publishers looked at this calculation and decided the
best way to do things, then, is to go all-in on live-service,
MTX-riddled, advert- and sponsorship-heavy games in a hope that they
can recoup some of the expenses. And --for the time being-- that
strategy is working, but it comes at a cost.

Yeah. The indies and smaller shops will step in. We're not back to games
in ziplock baggies, but AAA games are not where it's at for me.

I prefer small dev-team options and will pay them handsomely. So long as
Unity doesn't shit the bed, this will continue to be available.

And then there's Larian. There's CDPR. There are single-A companies that
try. We need to be forgiving of them and support them. I bought Cyberpunk
2077 at a discount to keep them honest.

It's not dead yet. It's just very badly burned.

I don't care if the textures aren't 4k. I just have to buy a much more
expensive graphics card and monitor then.

--
Zag

This is csipg.rpg - reality is off topic. ...G. Quinn ('08)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Mar 25 * "They Just Have To Be Good"26Spalls Hurgenson
21 Mar 25 `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"25Zaghadka
22 Mar 25  `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"24JAB
22 Mar 25   +* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"6Zaghadka
23 Mar 25   i`* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"5JAB
23 Mar 25   i `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"4Zaghadka
23 Mar 25   i  `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"3Dimensional Traveler
24 Mar 25   i   `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"2Zaghadka
24 Mar 25   i    `- Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"1Dimensional Traveler
22 Mar 25   +* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"7vallor
23 Mar 25   i`* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"6Zaghadka
23 Mar 25   i `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"5vallor
23 Mar 25   i  `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"4vallor
23 Mar 25   i   `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"3Rin Stowleigh
23 Mar 25   i    +- Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"1Zaghadka
24 Mar 25   i    `- Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"1vallor
23 Mar 25   `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"10candycanearter07
23 Mar 25    `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"9Zaghadka
25 Mar 25     `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"8candycanearter07
27 Mar 25      `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"7Zaghadka
28 Mar 25       `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"6candycanearter07
29 Mar 25        `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"5Spalls Hurgenson
31 Mar 25         `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"4candycanearter07
31 Mar 25          `* Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"3Spalls Hurgenson
31 Mar 25           +- Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"1.../v]andrak|≡...
3 Apr 25           `- Re: "They Just Have To Be Good"1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal