Re: Dial-up modems (Re: FREE GAME: Spirit of the Mouse)

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:45:02 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 00:16:58 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:
>

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 02:07:34 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

Justisaur <justisaur@gmail.com> wrote:

>

We had an acoustic coupler for awhile.  I think I could type faster than
it sent letters.

>

That's like 300 speed. ;)

>

Depends on how fast you can type :-)
300 baud is probably amazingly fast to hunt-n-peck typists.

>
I hunt and peck on smartphones since I have to have one hand hold it and while other hand type!
>
>

And in the 80s, before GUIs were common and everything -even a lot of
games - were character-based, 300 baud was probably usable, if a bit
slow. Although I can't imagine using anything that pokey for
downloading stuff; even 28,8kbps was tedious at those speeds (the
original Doom Shareware took me over an hour to get, back in the day).
Even looking at images was a chore; you'd queue up two or three and
that would be it for the night ;-)

>
Yeah, but you had those evil line noises!!!!!!!!!!!!

>
No, you didn't. Most modems supported the AT M0 command, which turned
off the speaker from the start. It was one of the first AT commands I
learned, and boy howdy did I make sure every AT string I used included
it! That squeal people associate with the dial-up era of the Internet?
>
I never heard it.
>

I loved that noise. Especially the *ping* *ping* of 52K.

--
Zag

No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had
spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten