Sujet : Re: Speaking of old games...
De : ant (at) *nospam* zimage.comANT (Ant)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 21. Apr 2024, 20:45:42
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <BAednW_-ULl78bj7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.6.14-200.fc39.x86_64 (x86_64))
Kyonshi <
gmkeros@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/21/2024 12:07 AM, Ant wrote:
Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com> wrote:
...
I had an Atari ST after my C-64 that I played a of games on. I might
count my intellivision before the C-64, All I remember liking was the
D&D game, tennis, and blackjack, though those aren't PC games.
Well, those old computers are personal. ;) Even Macs.
Ah, we are choosing violence today, hmm?
(not that I think you are wrong, I totally agree with you)
Yeah, it bugs me when people think PCs are just IBM types. Many
computers are personal! They should just say IBM PCs to be specific.
-- "And he has given us this command: Whoever loves God must also love his brother." --1 John 4:21. 42024 date was the same in reverse!Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org. / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )