Sujet : Re: OT: Civ VII worth the money?
De : jfwaldby (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Mandrake the Perihelion)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 14. Apr 2025, 08:06:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Justification
Message-ID : <m63qf5FsjckU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
JAB wrote:
On 13/04/2025 16:42, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
I play Civ IV quite a bit and am starting to play Civ VI some more. It used to run my fan too much for comfort, but I've noticed as the PC constantly updates that games that were hard on the fan are now at a comfy rate. I'm talking about those updates like to the BIOS and Windows 11 that come out about twice a month. That's where I suspect the savings are coming from.
Everything I've read about it so far says it should be a no-buy currently. There are mixed reviews with some people liking the new mechanics and others saying this isn't a Civ game. That's really a personal choice thing.
The big problem though, that the game isn't complete/polished seems to have a strong consensus. Then you have that it's been set-up to sell DLC that really should be in the base game. I mean why would you include Britain in the base game as they have made zero impact on world history.
I know what you mean. Diablo IV disincluded the Necromancer of all classes. I refused to buy it separately as a matter of posterity. Nevermind that it was my favorite class in Diablo II & III.
-- "It will be a longAnd difficult warIt will be conductedOn many frontsBut as long as it takes
We will prevail
Across the world governments
Have heard this message
You're either with us or you're with the terrorists
Tyranny
Terror
& Lawless Violence"
-- George W. Bush