Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg action 
Sujet : Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install
De : horchata12839 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Praetor Mandrake)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Date : 22. Jun 2025, 03:21:13
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <mbp7kqFr926U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.21
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 14:05:05 -0400, Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> wrote:
 
Praetor Mandrake <horchata12839@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
>
It's currently 150+.  Why don't they just make it a terabyte and no one
can fit it on their comp?
>
You _don't_ have a multi-terabyte drive?
>
What, you think it's 2010 or something?
>
>
Current System:  2TB SSD + 16TB of Spinning Rust
>
Hell I even have a 1TB USB Stick.
>
Xocyll
 In fairness, a lot of laptops (and even some computers) are /still/
shipping with hard-drives* less than 1TB, and I'm always surprised at
how many people use ordinary laptops --not even overpriced gaming
laptops, but just regular 'designed mostly for office work' laptops--
as their primary gaming platform. Space for games on these machines is
at a premium, and dedicating 100+GB to a single title can be /very/
annoying.
It's kind of like a bubble that pops when the install is 100+ GB.  I had this with Street Fighter V, GTA V and Baldur's Gate III.  When I finally decide to uninstall, about ten other games instantly fill the vacuum.  I started to realize that <2 GB for a game is nearly trivial (on half a terabyte).
--
Be penitent and penetrate
Between the liquor and all these lies
See past the bruises of your hate
Come face to face and meet your Fate

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Jun 25 * World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install24Praetor Mandrake
21 Jun 25 `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install23Xocyll
21 Jun 25  +* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install11Spalls Hurgenson
22 Jun 25  i+* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Praetor Mandrake
23 Jun 25  ii`- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1candycanearter07
8 Jul 25  i`* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install8Spalls Hurgenson
9 Jul 25  i `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install7JAB
10 Jul 25  i  `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install6candycanearter07
10 Jul 25  i   `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install5Spalls Hurgenson
11 Jul 25  i    +* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install3Xocyll
11 Jul 25  i    i`* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Spalls Hurgenson
12 Jul 25  i    i `- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1Xocyll
14 Jul 25  i    `- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1candycanearter07
22 Jun 25  `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install11Praetor Mandrake
23 Jun 25   `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install10Xocyll
23 Jun 25    `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install9Spalls Hurgenson
23 Jun 25     +- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1Xocyll
24 Jun 25     `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install7JAB
24 Jun 25      `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install6Xocyll
24 Jun 25       +* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Dimensional Traveler
26 Jun 25       i`- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1Xocyll
25 Jun 25       `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install3JAB
26 Jun 25        `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Xocyll
26 Jun 25         `- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1JAB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal