Sujet : Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K
De : Xocyll (at) *nospam* gmx.com (Xocyll)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 01. Jun 2025, 13:28:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <oqho3k9ju5tilr34qsnolcajjorutsv2cj@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Forte Agent 2.0/32.640
JAB <
noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:
On 31/05/2025 04:32, Justisaur wrote:
There's that too. The room's not very big and having something that
large would be like watching 12' tall giants. I wouldn't mind slightly
larger than the 40 something inch we have now, but not a 92"
>
As the old joke goes, why buy a bigger TV when you can just move closer
to the screen.
Cause there's a finite limit to how many people can get closer to the
screen.
Xocyll
-- I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably, Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.www.avast.com