Sujet : Re: Command & Conquer Ultimate Collection
De : noway (at) *nospam* nochance.com (JAB)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 15. Mar 2024, 15:01:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ut1kbn$2a5t6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14/03/2024 17:10, candycanearter07 wrote:
Ah. I've seen that kinda "sequel being worse in every way" a lot of
times, tho the only thing that comes to mind rn is Paper Mario Sticker
Star..
I think sequels are hard as, well at least for me, what makes the original game so special is that it was doing something a bit new and a sequel just won't have that. A couple of exceptions I can think of are Combat Mission II:Barbarossa to Berlin and Close Combat III: The Russian Front. Both of them improved a formula that I really liked but the big draw was they were based on the Eastern Front which I just find more interesting. Oh and a special mention to FO:NV.
Most of the time though, I know I'm not going to enjoy it as much as the game that came before.