Sujet : Re: Are 'we' too negative?
De : wipnoah (at) *nospam* gmail.com (H1M3M)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 06. Sep 2024, 14:51:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vbf1d2$rde6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
JAB wrote:
On 04/09/2024 15:52, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 9/4/2024 2:13 AM, JAB wrote:
On 02/09/2024 18:33, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:49:29 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com>
wrote:
I am algorithm free, to the point my brother asked how can I enjoy
youtube with anonymous clients that only give me what I asked for in the
search, no algorythm. "What's the point of youtube if they don't tell
you what to watch?"
I jusk ask other humans, IRL or in direct private conversations what
they think of new games, both the good and the bad. Works better for my
enjoyment.
But anyways, I frecuent anonymous imageboards. Compared to that, all
negative press looks positive. Not like it even affects me. I live in
some sort of Nintendo + retro gaming bubble, away from reality.
Are 'we' too negative?
Re: Are 'we' too negative?