Re: Are 'we' too negative?

On 9/11/2024 1:42 AM, JAB wrote:

On 09/09/2024 16:13, Dimensional Traveler wrote:

No as it's done nationally so everyone in the entire country who took the exam at the same time is included regardless of who their classmates were i.e. your grade was dependent on how thousands and thousands of other students did in the entire country.

>
So they actually grade the entire country on the curve?
>

>
Yep that's how it was done, nationally although there were several different exam boards who controlled their own grading and in theory they all had to stick to the same overall standard. I suppose it's technically possible that if you did a horribly obscure* subject with the right exam board they may be some deviation as all you peers are dimwits/Mr. Spocks.
>
*There weren't a lot of them as schools were generally quite conservative so ours was considered a bit avant garde as it offered commerce (business studies). Even then they then played it safe by you had to be in the bottom stream to take it.

>
Somehow that sounds very ... British.  :P

 Probably the most British part of it was how it entrenched the class system. So years 1 -3 (11 - 13 years old) classes were mixed ability but in years 4 - 5 everything was split into the top and bottom streams*. That pretty much put you on to a path of either your going to college to do A levels and then possibly onto to University or we'll keep you amused for a couple of years until you're old enough to get a job. Let's just say there was somewhat of a correlation between class and which stream you were in.
 It wasn't until the mid-90's they they really tried to shake it up and provide access to all and not just some.
 *Yes they really were called the top and bottom streams just in case you didn't realise were you sat in the pecking order of life.

So the point wasn't to objectively determine how much the students had learned but to identify the proper social strata everyone should be in.
--
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.