Sujet : Re: "8 Classic Games You Haven't Played (but should)"
De : rridge (at) *nospam* csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 01. Feb 2025, 16:20:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnle3s$5bg6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Spalls Hurgenson <
spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:
Personally, I preferred the older game. "Powermonger" just added on
layers of complexity I felt were unnecessary. Although, again, that
might be because I came across it later. Perhaps had I played
"Powermonger" first, I would have been bitching about how stupidly
simplified they'd made "Populous". ;-P
I was disappointed by Powermonger. It sounded like the strategy game I
had been waiting for, but it turned out to be underwelming. It's been
so long I'm not entirely sure why I thought I'd like it and why I didn't,
but I think the main problem was a lack of depth.
Can we both agree, though, that "Syndicate" was the better of both
games? ;-)
I might also agree, but Syndicate crashed a lot for me so I never got
far in the game.
-- l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU[oo][oo] rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca-()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca:11068/ db //