Sujet : Re: Starship Trooper remake?
De : dtravel (at) *nospam* sonic.net (Dimensional Traveler)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 06. Mar 2025, 15:58:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vqcd5v$313pd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/6/2025 2:12 AM, JAB wrote:
On 04/03/2025 15:30, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 08:58:53 +0000, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
>
On 03/03/2025 16:08, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
I'm sure it will go just as well as the "Robocop" and "Total Recall"
remakes.
>
That's two films that really didn't need to be remade as although some
of the effects are a bit dated the films themselves are still very good
so what does a remake actually achieve.
>
Money, dear friend; lots and lots of money. Maybe not at the box
office, but Hollywood Accounting ensures that the studios make a
profit even when the movie itself is a total flop.
>
And in the case of both these movies, they made cash at box office
too. Robocop 2014 made $250 million on a $100 million budget, and
Total Recall 2012 made $210 million on a $125 budget. They weren't
blockbuster successes, but the producers cashed out quite comfortably.
Sequels and remakes are almost certain successes, every time.
"Starship Trooper" doesn't need a sequel either, but that won't stop
millions of people from going to see it anyway. What else are they
going to do; go see something original?
>
This is more from a watcher's point of view so why pay more than it would cost to buy an actual copy of the original film that is better than the remake.
Because "I can do it BETTER!" and "Kids don't watch old movies!"
-- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.