Sujet : Re: Low Review #s good / unusual games.
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 18. Apr 2024, 17:40:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <uvrid7$2bqf7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Spalls Hurgenson <
spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 16:19 this Thursday (GMT):
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:10:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07
<candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com> wrote at 02:46 this Thursday (GMT):
>
What are your favorite games with low numbers of reviews?
>
Oh, 3000 counts as low? I'd like to add DLCquest then.
>
>
>
I played that one. It had its moments, but the joke became tired
pretty quickly. It didn't really have the gameplay to justify its
price. It felt like one of those Flash games that used to infest the
net, like the fake "WinBlowz 95" game that was briefly popular. You'd
load it up, play around with it for 10 or 15 minutes, chortle at the
joke, then put it away forever. But at least those were free...
>
I think it was pretty funny. Then again, I also bought it for a
multi-game randomizer before realizing the linux version specifically
wasn't compatible and didn't bother to refund it.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Low Review #s good / unusual games.
Re: Low Review #s good / unusual games.