Sujet : Re: Intel's High-End CPU Problem
De : anssi.saari (at) *nospam* usenet.mail.kapsi.fi (Anssi Saari)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 23. Apr 2024, 10:06:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : An impatient and LOUD arachnid
Message-ID : <sm05xw8fnyc.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) writes:
rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) writes:
Right now that means the 7800X3D is the fastest all around gaming CPU
money can buy. Paying more for a 7950X or 7950X3D will actually get
you worse performance in many games.
>
Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote:
These seem to be a "citation needed" type of claims. What do you base
these on? With a quick look, tomshardware and anandtech don't seem to
agree.
>
Should've been too hard to find this statement in Tom's Hardware's
CPU Rankings:
Well, to be exact, I really wanted you to support your snipped claim,
specifically this:
"The two chiplet AMD Ryzen 9 59xx and 79xx CPUs all perform
significantly worse in games compared to the much cheaper Ryzen 7 single
chiplet 5800X3D and 7800X3D CPUs of the same generation."
The performance seems slightly lower but that isn't significantly worse.