Re: BASIC turns 60

On Sun, 5 May 2024 15:11:54 -0700, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Dimensional Traveler wrote:

On 5/5/2024 1:03 PM, Darth Ant wrote:

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:

Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote at 18:38 this Thursday (GMT):

Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 5/1/2024 2:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

>
I'd wager that even if you don't know anything else about it, most
people have at least heard of the BASIC programming language. Designed
as an easy-to-use language, its comparatively lightweight footprint
paired well with the newest microcomputers of the 70s and 80s. It was
the de facto standard language for many PCs - in fact, for the longest
time, even IBM PC/Compatibles would try to boot to a BASIC interpreter
if no boot-sector was found on floppy or hard-drive, burning the
nonsensical "No ROM BASIC System Halted" message into many a PC-users
brain if there was a disk failure).
>
In some ways BASIC was the Java of its time; a common language that
(more or less) ran on many different computers regardless of
hardware.* Many classic games were coded in BASIC, and -even as the
world slowly moved away from that language - many developer's first
steps (and games!) were made using BASIC. Microsoft's first product
was a BASIC interpreter; without it, they'd never have had the cash to
'create' their DOS operating system and we might still all be under
the thumb of IBM (and probably still using 16-bit processors. IBM
hated innovation). I myself have semi-fond memories of typing in BASIC
programs from some magazine into my 8-bit PC, and then struggling to
understand what the hell I was doing.
>
Anyway, BASIC turned 60 today, with the first BASIC program being run
1 May 1964 in Dartmouth College. So let's all raise a glass to this
pioneer of computing that helped make the microcomputer industry the
success it is today.
>

>

* not quite, since BASIC interpretations varied from platform to
platform, but - especially in the early days - it didn't take too much
effort to port programs between different systems

>

I took a BASIC class in Jr. College in the 80's, I made a few programs.
The one I remember most was one that would roll D&D characters on 3d6 in
order until you qualified for the class you wanted to play (1e/2e) which
was over 1000 rolls for the one Paladin.

>

I'm still slowly trying to learn Javascript, but it makes absolutely no
sense to me in comparison.  I can type a simple program in and try to
figure out why it isn't working, but that's about it, which is discouraging.

>

I had tried to learn Python many years ago on my own, but just didn't
have the motivation, I remember it making a lot more sense though.
Maybe I should go back to that, but I wanted the web native abilities of
Javascript.

>
I don't like coding. I do like breaking stuff though as a QA tester. ;)

 

Wait you were a QA tester?

 
Yep from 1998 to 2016.

>
So we can blame you for all the bad games!
>

No. We can thank him for stomping out the critical bugs they wanted to
launch with.

--
Zag

No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had
spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten