Liste des Groupes | Revenir à csipg action |
On 24/07/2024 16:10, Zaghadka wrote:Hmm. I haven't seen that. Or do I just not know the difference and think I do?On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:40:58 +0100, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, JABGetting peeved for no particular reason is part of the human condition!
wrote:
>On 22/07/2024 16:09, Zaghadka wrote:>To "PC" game, because these were also contemporary "personal computers,">
you had a C=64, Atari ST, Amiga, or Speccy (thanks JAB!). An MSX in
Japan. That's what kept enthusiasm going. I never accepted IBM ownership
of the term. To call them the source of PC gaming in the 80's is, IMHO,
silly. I regard the Z-80, the 6502, and the Motorolla 68000 as primary
contributors to continuity of computer gaming. IBM was for work. The
80286 was simply not a gaming chip. The 8086 was a footnote.
I can't say it's something that's ever bothered me as in the 80's the
term personal computer wasn't really used here but instead home
computer. Also when I hear the term PC I actually don't think of
'personal computer' as such but instead an IBM compatible which isn't a
laptop even that that's also a PC, or is it. I think I've confused
myself now!
>
To each his own. I wore a Che Guevara shirt with "The C=64 is also a PC,
idiots!" emblazoned over his face. All you could see was the beret.
>
I lived a stone's throw from Armonk at the time, though.
>
Part of me dies inside every time I see someone use acronym interchangeable with abbreviation. I do now have to accept that meaning has basically entered common usage but still.
Another one is begs for question for raises the question instead of its more formal meaning.I never used "begs the question" and I still don't fully understand what it's supposed to mean even after watching multiple videos and reading numbers of rants on it.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.