Sujet : Re: It looks like gambling, feels like gambling, pays out (almost) like gambling... but it's not gambling
De : noway (at) *nospam* nochance.com (JAB)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 27. Jul 2024, 10:06:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v82dbg$3ae6n$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/07/2024 19:14, Justisaur wrote:
Funny how there's new(ish) great games I get the whole package as well. Elden Ring (too much package!) Cyerpunk 2077, Witcher 3, Balder's Gate 3. Yes 3 of those have DLCs, but they're real DLCs adding more gameplay, not just some horse armor.
I don't have any intrinsic dislike of DLC as long as it's done right. So you release a game then sometime later you release a few DLC's for players who just want more. Where it goes wrong is when it feels like, because it is, taking something out of a base game and then trying to sell it back to you. I think it was Dragon Age that I was playing and wondered what the marker was on the screen, oh it gives me an opportunity to buy a DLC.
Where I'm very supportive of it is with certain strategy games. So you buy the base game which has enough content but is probably going to be US vs. Nazis* in Normandy. Then they will release DLC's to cover other parts of WWI and you can pick and choose which ones take your fancy. So fancy France 1940, a criminally uncovered period, yep you can get it.
*I understand why this is the big goto but it still irritates me slightly, mainly because of having to listen to too many people from the US who think they won WWII single handedly.