Sujet : Re: Just how realistic ARE those video games!?
De : Xocyll (at) *nospam* gmx.com (Xocyll)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 18. Sep 2024, 08:07:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <6sukej1e7n0njj152mdj5opslhilvv780o@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Forte Agent 2.0/32.640
Rin Stowleigh <
rstowleigh@x-nospam-x.com> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:46:48 -0700, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>
The usual reason why more military forces don't use off-the-shelf
civilian gear is the military usually want's them to be more durable,
have a wider range of temperatures they can operate at, EMP resistant
frequently, waterproof and so on. That's why you get $500 dollar ash
trays, they are designed to break without leaving sharp edges that can
cut and injure personnel as the pieces fly around in a battle.
>
The image of soldiers having a smoke and caring that the ashes land in
an ashtray with one hand and shooting with the other is entertaining
in itself.
>
Besides, it would make me uneasy to know my freedoms were purportedly
being protected by any military too stupid to realize that a $4
ashtray made of fiberglass or many other flameproof/shatterproof
materials would work just as well there.
This is the military procurement known for $640 toilet seats after all.
They never, ever, ever spend less when they can spend more then ask for
a bigger budget next year.
Xocyll