Re: FREE GAMES: "Castlevania" and "Snakebird"

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:50:06 -0000 (UTC), in
comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, candycanearter07 wrote:
>

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 15:39 this Saturday (GMT):

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:28:44 -0600, Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:12:31 -0500, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

>

>
Sometimes the freebies are worth getting, sometimes not. Are these?
You decide. You've got a week to claim them, as usual. Until then...

>

In short, yes.

>

THIS! IS! NUMBAAAAAAAH!
(My number is considerably larger than "300")

>
Huh. A 300 reference. I thought you were going for numberwang at
first.
>
My number too is larger than 300.
>
At the rate I'm playing games, compared to the rate I'm _acquiring_
games, I'm not sure I've enough years left in my life to get through
the back catalog. I may need to switch tactics.
>
I guess it's time for....
>
CRAP poll #9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.03*
>
What should I do to solve the aforementioned dilemma:
>
    a) stop acquiring new games (and get sent to Numerical hell!)
    b) start poop-socking it so I can play more games
    c) play less of each game (perhaps: install, launch, 'oh
       that's neat', quit, uninstall, repeat)
    d) invent a time machine.
    e) become immortal
    f) wage war against video game developers so they stop
       releasing new games
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
* may not be an actual official CRAP poll.

>
>
Hey wait, you can't use a floating point number there :(

>
But you can use floating point precision. I refuse to declare an integer
variable here.