Sujet : Re: I'm having fun with this latest NZXT scandal
De : noway (at) *nospam* nochance.com (JAB)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 10. Dec 2024, 11:39:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vj95p1$tqf2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 07/12/2024 19:51, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
But NZXT also sells complete systems, and this is what's gotten them
into trouble recently. Or rather, it's not the sales of their PCs, but
their rental options. Now, renting a PC is never a good idea, and
NZXT's option is possibly the worst choice, since it's not
'rent-to-own' but 'rent, rent, rent and rent some more and at the end
you got nothin' to show for it.' But even that is forgivable, except
NZXT used bait-n-switch tactics; they showed one computer for sale and
then another -using the exact same model name- for rent... despite the
two machines not having the same specs. The language used on their
websites was fairly misleading too (the fine print made it clear you
didn't own the computer in the end, but language elsewhere implied
otherwise, even if it never said so outright). Worse, their contract
essentially gave them carte blanche to your data on the rented
machine, should they chose to exercise that right (there's no evidence
they ever did so and it's likely it was just boilerplate language...
but still).
I'm not intrinsically against the idea of rent, rent, rent but i just don't see how it works with a PC. In the UK leasing cars has become a big thing but the difference there is people like the new cars and the manufactures are generally taking a chunk out of the second hand market while adding to their own one. Where's the equivalent in the PC world?
Oh of course NXZT's rather scummy approach doesn't exactly sell the idea either.