Sujet : Re: Microsoft Flip-Flops on Win11 requirements
De : spallshurgenson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Spalls Hurgenson)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 12. Dec 2024, 23:42:37
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <nfpmljttogclku8ka0e6fbdv16lh8ou1jc@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:27:41 +0200, Anssi Saari
<
anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote:
Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> writes:
>
Microsoft's Windows10 operating system was one of its most popular
products. Windows 11, however, has seen a much slower uptake. This is
in part because it requires built in TPM, a hardware encryption
processor that not all computers have built in.
>
What happened to the fairly stringent CPU requirements? Were they lifted
earlier or something?
>
I have a couple of 2010-ish laptops with Windows 10 which I haven't used
in a few years. I guess I could keep the better one of them around still
although I don't really know what for...
I think all the increased CPU requirements had to do with ensuring the
processors had TPM support. From what I've read, architecturally
there's no real performance difference running Win10 and Win11 on the
same hardware. Win10 just didn't /require/ TPM. Win11 does.
(and note, it STILL requires it. Microsoft just isn't bending over
backwards to prevent you from running it on unsupported hardware
anymore)
I mean, hell, Win11 technically supports Intel Atom processors. ;-)