Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg action 
Sujet : Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?
De : zaghadka (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zaghadka)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Date : 02. Jan 2025, 20:09:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : E. Nygma & Sons, LLC
Message-ID : <o1pdnj5gpsu3rc9umgm2tk22af019mhqro@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 09:59:24 -0500, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 16:40:17 +0200, Anssi Saari
<anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote:
>
Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com> writes:
>
My biggest pet peeve:
>
ESCORT QUESTS. Omg escort quests. Keep this dumb bastard alive. Then
he/she/they charge out into enemy fire, with the worst AI and pathfinding
ever, and it becomes a chore just to manage all the aggro they're
drawing, let alone protect them. Maybe keep a low profile and _follow_,
not lead dumbass. Maybe don't get stuck jogging against that rock like
you're running a no-log macro.
>
I remember one game which did it right but can't remember the name. Kind
of a stab at a PC version of the Amiga classic "Warhead" but with
horrendous live action video and the game seemed unfinished. Oh,
wikipedia tells me it was "XF5700 Mantis Experimental Fighter". The
escort missions went like this: mission starts, you engage autopilot,
mission ends. Best escort missions ever :)
>
>
Heh. Finally somebody else familiar with XF5700 Mantis. Truly a
horrific game. Even after thirty years, it remains my top pick for
worst voice acting in a game.
>
(The gameplay wasn't much better either. But the intro was pretty
neat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIdUhRNZXRQ )
>
That is a deep, deep cut. I'm surprised. I had no idea what either of you
are talking about.

--
Zag

This is csipg.rpg - reality is off topic. ...G. Quinn ('08)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Dec 24 * Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?29Justisaur
20 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Dimensional Traveler
20 Dec 24 +* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?4JAB
20 Dec 24 i`* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?3Justisaur
21 Dec 24 i +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Zaghadka
22 Dec 24 i `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1JAB
20 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Spalls Hurgenson
20 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Anssi Saari
21 Dec 24 +* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?13Zaghadka
21 Dec 24 i+* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?6Mark P. Nelson
21 Dec 24 ii+* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Ross Ridge
21 Dec 24 iii`- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Zaghadka
21 Dec 24 ii+- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Zaghadka
21 Dec 24 ii`* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Zaghadka
23 Dec 24 ii `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Xocyll
2 Jan 25 i`* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?6Anssi Saari
2 Jan 25 i `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?5Spalls Hurgenson
2 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?4Zaghadka
3 Jan 25 i   `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?3Spalls Hurgenson
7 Jan 25 i    `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Justisaur
8 Jan 25 i     `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Spalls Hurgenson
21 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1candycanearter07
22 Dec 24 +* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Spalls Hurgenson
22 Dec 24 i`- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Spalls Hurgenson
23 Dec 24 `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?5Ross Ridge
30 Dec 24  +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Ross Ridge
31 Dec 24  `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?3Dimensional Traveler
31 Dec 24   `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Spalls Hurgenson
1 Jan 25    `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Justisaur

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal