Re: VR still on the rise?

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The
Augury is good, the signs say:

Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> wrote at 15:39 this Friday (GMT):

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The
Augury is good, the signs say:
>

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 15:39 this Tuesday (GMT):

On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 06:01:52 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:
>

Bah VR. I don't want to wear anything. I do want a holodeck!

>
What about a neural-link to bypass the physical and directly input
fantasies into your neural cortex?
>
Pros: More likely to happen than a holodeck
Cons: you'll likely also be giving corporate shitbags direct access to
your brain.

>
>
I'm terrified what kind of malpractice companies would do with access to
your mind.

>
Don't have to imagine, the 101ers in Ready Player One already spelled it
out, 70% of your view filled with ads all the time.
>
Xocyll

>
>
Yeah, wasn't there something about the maximum amount they could get
away with without causing seizures?

Exactly.

Xocyll