Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg action 
Sujet : Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?
De : spallshurgenson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Spalls Hurgenson)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Date : 08. Jan 2025, 16:26:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <uq5tnj197jb9vo2regf03oi8vc206i16r0@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:32:17 -0800, Justisaur <justisaur@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 1/3/2025 7:24 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
XF5700 Mantis
>
Wow, that *is* impressive! a space sim at a time I really liked them*
from a company I really liked, that I never even heard of!


In fairness, it was only /published/ by Microprose, and even then it
was published under their budget/partner label, "Microplay". The game
itself was programmed by Paragon Software, who are perhaps more
famously known for their GDW-licensed CRPGs like "MegaTraveller",
"Space 1889" and "Twilight 2000".

     [What, you never heard of those either? Imagine that. It's
      almost as if Paragon's games just weren't very memorable...
      or good]

Microprose eventually bought the struggling company outright, and they
went on to make two half-way decent games, "BloodNet" and "Challenge
of the Five Realms". I believe XF5700 was the last game they made
independently.

The Microplay brand never got much marketing oomph; it's where all the
smaller, less-likely-to-be-successful games were banished. Still, I
recall seeing "XF5700 Mantis" on store shelves for a good while
(probably because the game wasn't selling, but still...). Like many of
Paragon's games, it was conceptually interesting, but it wasn't well
implemented. It just wasn't a game I -or seemingly most people-
enjoyed playing.


* I still like space sims, but I think it's been closer to 50/50 these
days, and the big names seem to disappoint more than the smaller ones.
I didn't care for SW Squadrons or Elite Dangerous for instance, but
loved Everspace and Rebel Galaxy Outlaw.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Dec 24 * Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?29Justisaur
20 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Dimensional Traveler
20 Dec 24 +* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?4JAB
20 Dec 24 i`* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?3Justisaur
21 Dec 24 i +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Zaghadka
22 Dec 24 i `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1JAB
20 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Spalls Hurgenson
20 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Anssi Saari
21 Dec 24 +* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?13Zaghadka
21 Dec 24 i+* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?6Mark P. Nelson
21 Dec 24 ii+* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Ross Ridge
21 Dec 24 iii`- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Zaghadka
21 Dec 24 ii+- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Zaghadka
21 Dec 24 ii`* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Zaghadka
23 Dec 24 ii `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Xocyll
2 Jan 25 i`* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?6Anssi Saari
2 Jan 25 i `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?5Spalls Hurgenson
2 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?4Zaghadka
3 Jan 25 i   `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?3Spalls Hurgenson
7 Jan 25 i    `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Justisaur
8 Jan 25 i     `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Spalls Hurgenson
21 Dec 24 +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1candycanearter07
22 Dec 24 +* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Spalls Hurgenson
22 Dec 24 i`- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Spalls Hurgenson
23 Dec 24 `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?5Ross Ridge
30 Dec 24  +- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Ross Ridge
31 Dec 24  `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?3Dimensional Traveler
31 Dec 24   `* Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?2Spalls Hurgenson
1 Jan 25    `- Re: Gamplay "mechanics" you don't like?1Justisaur

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal