Sujet : Re: 90s RTS
De : spallshurgenson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Spalls Hurgenson)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 23. Jan 2025, 16:32:00
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ffn4pjpf0mh2jg6dai3rsbseecbo5oa49u@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:28:12 -0500, Mike S. <
Mike_S@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:47:06 -0600, Black Pearl <j63480576@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
Anyways, WC2 is a nice challenge and I'm making swift progress.
>
I am sure Starcraft and Warcraft 3 are better games but Warcraft 2 is
my favorite Blizzard RTS.
I mean, "best" is so subjective. Honestly, the Warcraft games -while
fun- never ranked all that highly for me, and I never could warm up to
Starcraft. The latter especially seemed more designed for the sort of
player who counts clicks-per-second as an important metric as to
whether an RTS game was good or not.
I always had more fun with the Command & Conquer series, but when it
came to games of the genre that I enjoyed the most, I tended to favor
the games that leaned more towards the tactical aspects. Games like
"Myth", "Ground Control", "Company of Heroes" or "WH40K Dawn of War".
But I tended to be fairly gregarious with the RTS genre, and made an
effort to play many of the games from that era. Still, a lot of the
RTS games that I remember best (aside from the obvious ones) came from
after the turn of the millennium. Games like "Nexus" or "Battle for
Middle Earth" or "Homeworld".