Sujet : Re: Aging Well
De : noway (at) *nospam* nochance.com (JAB)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 04. Mar 2025, 10:18:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vq6gi0$1q42t$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 25/02/2025 00:53, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
What do you think? Are these eleven games good examples of having
'aged insanely well'? Do you have a better selection? Or are you sort
of like me, and think most of these games just came out yesterday? 😉
I must admit they have a strange view on what old games are. Of the ones I've played they are still quite playable today. Part of that I think is that since maybe the 2010's graphics reached a stage where the rate of increase in quality started slowing down and you had already reached a stage where they were acceptable to me even now. I if look at something like Crysis:Warhead the graphics are still perfectly fine even if they don't have all the bells and whistles you get now days. If you compare that to a game from say 1998 they really are worlds apart.
The other thing I believe plays a part is a lot of player mechanics/QoL features have kept relatively the same.