Sujet : Re: Aging Well
De : ant (at) *nospam* zimage.comANT (Ant)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 06. Mar 2025, 21:13:03
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <hU2dnXppTP9SnFf6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (Linux/6.12.15-200.fc41.x86_64 (x86_64))
Spalls Hurgenson <
spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 02:46:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:
Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:
The joy in Mirror's Edge were in mastering its mechanical aspects. If
doing the same run over and over trying to get the fastest time / most
efficient route sound fun, you'll like the game. But as a
single-player narrative experience... not so much. It's not that the
free-running is bad (although I think its wasted in first-person view)
but it is interspersed with a dull story and awful combat sequences,
and that weakens the overall experience.
It has some nice aesthetics though. All that white and red; the
visuals are incredibly impressive.
Is it like Superhot? https://store.steampowered.com/app/322500/SUPERHOT/
If so, then I enjoyed it even though it got annoying in some parts. At
least, it was short (managed to finish it during its free weekend!) and
had a decent story/plot.
I mean, I can't deny there are /some/ similarities, in that both use a
very stylized and pared down color gamut. But the games are are
completely different mechanically, and "SuperHot's" visuals are a lot
more basic than "Mirror's Edge".
Both, ultimately, are also about mastering the mechanics, but
"Superhot" is a lot more upfront about it. "Mirror's Edge" story keeps
getting in the way.
It's not that it's a bad game, but you really are made to expect a lot
more from the game then you ultimately get.
Aw. Nothing good after that? Maybe I will pass. :( What about its sequel?
I wouldn't say there's 'nothing good'. The game is fairly solid... for
what it is; an above-average shooter with some light role-playing
elements, a fixation on environmental traps, and a neat Art-Deco
visual style. It's a good game. It's just not a TERRIFIC game.
(The end-boss absolutely sucks, though).
Haha, like System Shock 2?! :P I still need to retry SS1, but with its
remake this time. I couldn't stand the controls in the original DOS
release. Loved the remake's tech demo years ago on my work's fancy high
end lappy (shh!) in 2016. Ugh, just no time! Heck, I failed to play my
iPhone's daily quick games and lost my play streaks yesterday!
https://matrix.zimage.com/_matrix/media/v3/download/ross154.net/wOPPStHwonotutCGsqPsoDfv/ima_8395693.png and
https://matrix.zimage.com/_matrix/media/v3/download/ross154.net/CToJXUZHQwRBagdIGLtxeQQJ/ima_91497ef.png.
DOH! FML! [sighs] :(
-- "Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death." --Romans 8:1-2. Ashy Humpy Day!Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org. / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )