Re: Go EU!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg action 
Sujet : Re: Go EU!
De : noway (at) *nospam* nochance.com (JAB)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Date : 10. Apr 2025, 08:16:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vt7r83$2fv07$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/04/2025 03:22, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
Now, of course, the EU Consumer Protection Commission's
recommendations don't have force of law; this still needs to be voted
on by the EU first. But the EU has been very pro-active in consumer
protections and privacy and it isn't that unlikely that the EU will
push these suggestions forward. And unlike the piecemeal
anti-lootbox/MTX laws that have already been passed individually by a
few member states (most notably Belgium), if the whole EU stands by
these recommendations, it won't be something that can be ignored.
More, the EU doesn't give slap-on-the-wrist fines to violators either.
This won't be something that publishers can just disregard, short of
abandoning the EU market (and 1/3 of their revenue) entirely
Well firstly, that saves me making a post about it. So on to the meat, the legal status seems slightly vague as I believe the CPC Network* have picked a target (some horse game aimed squarely at kids) and are using the interpretation of existing EU consumer protect laws to say these type of practices go against them. My assumption is that if you get a case in one member state then you've basically given the green light to all member states.
One of the funny parts was that organisation that represents the games industry (which doesn't include consumers of course) have said that this may disrupt games for users. Yes how awful having some of your games disrupted by removing parts of MTX - won't anybody think of the grande fromages yearly bonuses!
*As far as I can tell that's really there to give more bite to authorities at national level and increase cooperation between member states.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Apr 25 * Switching to a higher price27Spalls Hurgenson
3 Apr 25 +* Re: Switching to a higher price2Spalls Hurgenson
9 Apr 25 i`- Re: Switching to a higher price1JAB
3 Apr 25 +* Re: Switching to a higher price11Rin Stowleigh
4 Apr 25 i`* Re: Switching to a higher price10Dimensional Traveler
4 Apr 25 i +* Re: Switching to a higher price8Rin Stowleigh
4 Apr 25 i i+* Re: Switching to a higher price6Dimensional Traveler
5 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: Switching to a higher price5Rin Stowleigh
5 Apr 25 i ii +* Re: Switching to a higher price3.../v]andrak|≡...
5 Apr 25 i ii i`* Re: Switching to a higher price2Rin Stowleigh
5 Apr 25 i ii i `- Re: Switching to a higher price1.../v]andrak|≡...
16 Apr 25 i ii `- Re: Switching to a higher price1Werner P.
16 Apr 25 i i`- Re: Switching to a higher price1Werner P.
4 Apr 25 i `- Re: Switching to a higher price1Spalls Hurgenson
7 Apr 25 +* Re: Switching to a higher price2H1M3M
9 Apr 25 i`- Re: Switching to a higher price1candycanearter07
9 Apr 25 +* Re: Switching to a higher price9JAB
9 Apr 25 i+* Re: Switching to a higher price7Spalls Hurgenson
9 Apr 25 ii+- Re: Switching to a higher price1JAB
10 Apr 25 ii`* Go EU! (was: Re: Switching to a higher price)5Spalls Hurgenson
10 Apr 25 ii `* Re: Go EU!4JAB
10 Apr 25 ii  `* Re: Go EU!3Spalls Hurgenson
10 Apr 25 ii   +- Re: Go EU!1Dimensional Traveler
12 Apr 25 ii   `- Re: Go EU!1JAB
16 Apr 25 i`- Re: Switching to a higher price1Werner P.
13 Apr 25 `* Re: Switching to a higher price2Spalls Hurgenson
14 Apr 25  `- Re: Switching to a higher price1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal