Sujet : Re: Thanks a lot, Nintendo!
De : noway (at) *nospam* nochance.com (JAB)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 04. May 2025, 09:40:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vv795f$1j3o7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 03/05/2025 18:47, Zaghadka wrote:
On Sat, 03 May 2025 11:03:02 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
People are just so used to being squeezed by corporations
that they'll just quietly accept this latest indignity... and probably
buy fewer games because of it.
I don't feel squeezed at all. There's been a major period of global
inflation, and games have been $60 forever.
(*Python accent*) "Grr. They should never raise prices! I'm being
oppressed!" Lol. 1st world problems.
Besides, I was talking about willingly paying $120 for a CRPG 10 years
ago because of all the effort that goes into them and the sheer number of
hours you get out of them. The $60 price point had, IMO, literally harmed
the genre. And I explicitly quoted that price point as *before* DLC.
People can and should accept this price increase.
The problem I find is that a lot of that content just isn't that interesting to me and also, depending on the game, I tend to get to twenty hours or so and feel that I've pretty much seen all the game has to offer so I want to move on to something new.
Saying that, none of this really matters to me personally as I just don't buy the big budget titles any more.