Re: Carmack's Revenge

On Fri, 23 May 2025 12:19:20 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Xocyll wrote:

Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of
the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:
>

On Fri, 23 May 2025 10:49:06 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Xocyll wrote:
>

Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
>

On 5/23/2025 5:21 AM, Xocyll wrote:

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
 

John Carmack once wrote about Doom, "Story in a game is like story in
a porn movie. It's expected to be there, but its not that important".
So it amuses me to no end that, with the advent of "Doom: Dark Ages"
Doom-lore has grown so extensive levels that it literally takes three
hours to describe it all.
>
     The DOOM Timeline | COMPLETE DOOM Story & Lore
       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5OdQYASIPQ&t
     (length: three hours, thirteen minutes and 59 seconds)
>
(admittedly, the narrator is extremely slow. A good editor could
probably cut it down to one-third that length. But who am I to bitch
about somebody being excessively verbose? ;-)
>
Honestly, one of the unspoken marvels of the nuDoom games is how they
managed to link together /all/ the different aspects of the Doom
franchise --be it the original games, the spin-offs like Doom64, or
even those awful movies-- into one cohesive (if not entirely logical)
narrative. I rather liked how they gave the demons more depth and
history than just random evil-things that you shoot, and I'm not
immune to the appeal of the power-fantasy that is the Doom Guy's
story.
>
The original Doom games were fun, but too self-contained. Monsters
appear, you kill them, end of story. "Doom 2016" --and more
importantly, "Doom Eternal"-- added enough new nooks and crannies that
the we can keep adventuring on for years. "Doom: Dark Ages" is just
one such exploration of that lore.
>
That said... even I have to admit it's a /bit/ much for a game that,
mechanically, is so simplistic. It's like somebody making a two-hour
Hollywood blockbuster out of a single game of Rock-Paper-Scissors. It
just seems so overboard and out of place for a game that relishes in
gore and guns.

 
With Keanu Reeves as Rock, Nicholas Cage as Paper and Dwayne Johnson as
Scissors.
 
<snip>
 
Xocyll

>
What a minute here!  How can Dwayne Johnson NOT be The Rock?!  Keanu
Reeves should be Scissors, he does more blade work.  But I agree that
Nicholas Cage is paper.  :)

>
Dwayne being Rock is too obvious, subvert expectations!
>

Johnny Depp should be scissors, for his work as Edward Scissorhands.

>
Again, too obvious.
>
If Dwayne can play a Tooth Fairy, he can play scissors.
>

Oh, I agree. I'm acting like a CSA numbskull on purpose.

No, that's too charitable. They'd probably cast Chris Rock as "Rock."

--
Zag

What's the point of growing up
if you can't be childish sometimes? ...Terrance Dicks, BBC