Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K

Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of
the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:

On Wed, 28 May 2025 05:22:56 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Xocyll wrote:
>

Hell I don't even buy Blu-Ray if DVD is an option - I literally see no
difference between them, so 4K Ultra was never in consideration.

>
I do Bluray for the audio. There I can definitely hear a difference. I
found this out when I got Fight Club on Bluray.

Ahh, I have no sound system hooked up to the TV, so it's just the
default speakers or more usually, cause I'm a considerate neighbor,
headphones.

But a 4k picture is only noticable to people with 20/10 vision on a
minimum 90" screen from 5-10 feet.

Frankly I think it's too high def, I don't need to be able to see inside
the actors pores.

Maybe if I had a Bradbury telewall I'd consider it.

The reference escapes me, but I have another; when Lily was briefly
living with Barney on How I Met Your Mother, he had a TV he'd imported
from Japan that was an entire wall of his living room.

A 300" Flat screen.

Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com