Sujet : Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K
De : ant (at) *nospam* zimage.comANT (Ant)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 31. May 2025, 20:40:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101flug$1dai5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (Linux/6.12.15-200.fc41.x86_64 (x86_64))
candycanearter07 <
candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
...
Hell I don't even buy Blu-Ray if DVD is an option - I literally see no
difference between them, so 4K Ultra was never in consideration.
>
Maybe if I had one of those huge-ass TVs I'd see a difference, but the
39" I have, you see none.
>
Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr
Same, I prefer DVD just bc it is a massive hassle to set up the Bluray
decryption stuff on a machine, and I literally couldn't care less about
the quality increase.
Yeah, BR is annoying in my computers. I can't even watch with VGA and
DVI via my OmniCube KVM from Y2K. :(
-- "Even youths grow tired and weary, and young men stumble and fall; but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint." --Isaiah 40:30-31. Quieter week before crazy next week?Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org. / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )