Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K

On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:09:22 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Xocyll wrote:

JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:
>

On 01/06/2025 17:23, Xocyll wrote:

(I'm pretty sure if it were up to my mother, she'd have had me watch
TV from the other room. I wonder where the 'you'd go blind' rumor
start anyway?)

Or been like my parents who bought into the whole "TV makes you stupid"
thing and allowed us 1 hour of TV ... a week.
 
Star Trek on Saturday afternoon of course.
2pm if I recall correctly, which I likely don't since it was 50+ years
ago.

>
I've always found that a weird argument as it really depends on what you
watch. I remember being fascinated watching Life on Earth with David
Attenborough, that's was pretty educational for a ten year old.

>
It was the 70s (barely) and TV was a wasteland of stupidity.
>

The strange thing is there isn't that same stigma about books even
though there are lots of books which are complete trash. You get the
same thing with watching 'too much' TV but being a bookworm is
considered a positive.

>
Books at least require you to be able to read, and stimulate the
imagination.
>

Apparently, you've never heard of "head canon." It's impossible *not* to
stimulate some imaginations.

--
Zag

What's the point of growing up
if you can't be childish sometimes? ...Terrance Dicks, BBC