Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg action 
Sujet : Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K
De : zaghadka (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zaghadka)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Date : 04. Jun 2025, 18:18:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : E. Nygma & Sons, LLC
Message-ID : <nqv04kl5v7vf8f7k1o54fmqkh40emgpcv6@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 13:53:57 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Xocyll wrote:

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
>
On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:52:01 -0500, Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
>
Larger sticks default to EX-FAT instead of FAT32, when it is possible to
format them as FAT32. They come that way, and Microsoft's format program
won't even give you the option of FAT32 at larger sizes.
>
Heheh. I bounced against this one hard when trying to update my
Windows98 computer to add a 300GB hard-drive. I'd remembered about
BIOS and FDISK limitations, but forgot that even on modern machines,
FORMAT wouldn't do more than a 32GB FAT32 drive.
(and EX-FAT isn't really a viable option for Windows98; there is a 3rd
party driver, but its not really ready-for-market yet)
>
The limitation in Microsoft's format program is artificial; the
programmer had to pick /some/ limit and -at the time- 32GB seemed so
impossibly huge that it didn't seem to matter. Microsoft never updated
the program ... probably in part because they wanted to push people to
NTFS (less for control --since unlike FAT, NTFS isn't patented-- but
because FAT is such a primative and fault-intolerant file-system they
wanted people to stop using it ASAP to make Windows look less terrible
:-)
>
Making MS Windows users change file systems to make windows look less
bad, is a bit like forcing Yugo drivers to change the brand of tires
they use to make the car less horrible.
>
Any partition edit program or 3rd party formatter, however, will let you
do this.
>
Although it probably won't matter as much with a hard-drive mostly
used for movies and such, cluster-sizes for FAT32 drives past 32GB
becomes problematic too. If your device is -as I believe you
indicated- cable of reading a 2TB HDD, then it probably supports EXFAT
(or possibly other file systems as well). So just format your 1TB
stick with the appropriate file-system (e.g., not FAT32) so you get
full capacity (931gB) and you should be good to go. Even Windows will
manage that ;-)
>
The device is a DVD/Blueray player.
The 1TB stick is exFAT and it cannot see it.
The 2TB external USB jack HDD is formatted NTFS.

Au contraire. You WANT FAT32. You just need to reformat it as such. It
will probably be "seen" then.

I mean, you don't have to /like/ FAT32, but it's what will work, IMO. If
the USB drive is NTFS, it might just read it formatted NTFS as well.

Cluster size may or may not matter. Large files? Doesn't really matter.

--
Zag

What's the point of growing up
if you can't be childish sometimes? ...Terrance Dicks, BBC

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K141Spalls Hurgenson
27 May 25 +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K4Zaghadka
27 May 25 i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3Spalls Hurgenson
27 May 25 i +- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1rms
29 May 25 i `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1JAB
28 May 25 +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K99Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i+* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K80Xocyll
28 May 25 ii+- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Spalls Hurgenson
29 May 25 ii+* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K49Zaghadka
29 May 25 iii+* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K40Spalls Hurgenson
30 May 25 iiii+- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 iiii`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K38Justisaur
30 May 25 iiii `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K37JAB
30 May 25 iiii  +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3Xocyll
1 Jun 25 iiii  i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2JAB
1 Jun 25 iiii  i `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
31 May 25 iiii  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K33Justisaur
31 May 25 iiii   +- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
1 Jun 25 iiii   `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K31JAB
1 Jun 25 iiii    `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K30Xocyll
1 Jun 25 iiii     +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K8JAB
1 Jun 25 iiii     i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K7Xocyll
1 Jun 25 iiii     i `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K6Spalls Hurgenson
4 Jun 25 iiii     i  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K5candycanearter07
4 Jun 25 iiii     i   `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K4Zaghadka
4 Jun 25 iiii     i    `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3Spalls Hurgenson
4 Jun 25 iiii     i     `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Zaghadka
7 Jun 25 iiii     i      `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1candycanearter07
1 Jun 25 iiii     +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Mr Rob
4 Jun 25 iiii     i`- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1JAB
1 Jun 25 iiii     `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K19Xocyll
4 Jun 25 iiii      `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K18JAB
4 Jun 25 iiii       +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K15Xocyll
4 Jun 25 iiii       i+* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2JAB
4 Jun 25 iiii       ii`- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
4 Jun 25 iiii       i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K12Zaghadka
4 Jun 25 iiii       i `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K11Xocyll
5 Jun 25 iiii       i  +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K4Mr Rob
5 Jun 25 iiii       i  i+- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
5 Jun 25 iiii       i  i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Rin Stowleigh
5 Jun 25 iiii       i  i `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
5 Jun 25 iiii       i  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K6JAB
5 Jun 25 iiii       i   `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K5Xocyll
5 Jun 25 iiii       i    +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2JAB
5 Jun 25 iiii       i    i`- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
5 Jun 25 iiii       i    `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Dimensional Traveler
5 Jun 25 iiii       i     `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
4 Jun 25 iiii       +- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Dimensional Traveler
5 Jun 25 iiii       `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Ross Ridge
30 May 25 iii`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K8Xocyll
30 May 25 iii `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K7Zaghadka
30 May 25 iii  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K6Xocyll
1 Jun 25 iii   +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Spalls Hurgenson
4 Jun 25 iii   i`- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1JAB
4 Jun 25 iii   `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3candycanearter07
4 Jun 25 iii    `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Zaghadka
7 Jun 25 iii     `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1candycanearter07
31 May 25 ii`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K29candycanearter07
31 May 25 ii +- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Ant
1 Jun 25 ii `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K27Xocyll
1 Jun 25 ii  +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K24Xocyll
1 Jun 25 ii  i+* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K21Dimensional Traveler
2 Jun 25 ii  ii+* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K9Xocyll
2 Jun 25 ii  iii`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K8Dimensional Traveler
2 Jun 25 ii  iii `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K7Xocyll
2 Jun 25 ii  iii  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K6Zaghadka
2 Jun 25 ii  iii   +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Xocyll
4 Jun 25 ii  iii   i`- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1candycanearter07
3 Jun 25 ii  iii   `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3Spalls Hurgenson
3 Jun 25 ii  iii    `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Xocyll
4 Jun 25 ii  iii     `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Zaghadka
4 Jun 25 ii  ii+- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1candycanearter07
4 Jun 25 ii  ii`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K10Xocyll
5 Jun 25 ii  ii +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K5Dimensional Traveler
5 Jun 25 ii  ii i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K4Xocyll
5 Jun 25 ii  ii i `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3Dimensional Traveler
5 Jun 25 ii  ii i  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Xocyll
7 Jun 25 ii  ii i   `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1candycanearter07
5 Jun 25 ii  ii `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K4Spalls Hurgenson
5 Jun 25 ii  ii  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3Xocyll
6 Jun 25 ii  ii   `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Zaghadka
6 Jun 25 ii  ii    `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
2 Jun 25 ii  i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2JAB
2 Jun 25 ii  i `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Dimensional Traveler
4 Jun 25 ii  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2JAB
4 Jun 25 ii   `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Xocyll
29 May 25 i+* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3JAB
29 May 25 ii`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Xocyll
29 May 25 ii `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Zaghadka
29 May 25 i`* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K15Zaghadka
29 May 25 i `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K14Xocyll
30 May 25 i  `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K13JAB
30 May 25 i   +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K4Mr Rob
30 May 25 i   i+- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Zaghadka
30 May 25 i   i+- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1JAB
30 May 25 i   i`- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Anssi Saari
30 May 25 i   +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3Xocyll
30 May 25 i   i+- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Zaghadka
1 Jun 25 i   i`- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1JAB
30 May 25 i   `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K5Zaghadka
31 May 25 i    +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K3JAB
31 May 25 i    `- Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K1Justisaur
28 May 25 +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2vallor
28 May 25 +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K7H1M3M
28 May 25 +* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K26Ant
28 May 25 `* Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K2Justisaur

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal