Sujet : Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.actionDate : 07. Jun 2025, 17:00:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrn1048o4k.3kmfh.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Xocyll <
Xocyll@gmx.com> wrote at 18:07 this Thursday (GMT):
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
>
On 6/5/2025 4:55 AM, Xocyll wrote:
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
On 6/4/2025 1:21 PM, Xocyll wrote:
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
<snip>
As for ripping discs, I have been using MakeMKV for years.
>
Just last night I remembered why I dislike .mkv format
>
I tried fast forwarding though one (on the HDD, via the dvd player) and
it could only go up to 3x speed (3 arrows), vs the 6 arrows an mp4 will
go at, and it seems like a logarithmic progression in the speeds.
>
So to get an hour plus to a specific spot in the movie if it's and mp4
takes 2-3 mins maybe but mkv takes 20 or more.
>
No Thanks!
>
As I said, there are multiple mkv->mp4 converters out there.
Oh I know, I have one. I just can't see where I would want to
deliberately rip to .mkv format only to then have to convert it
afterwards when I could just rip to .mp4 in the first place.
Why generate more work for myself to no gain?
Ah, I missed that you are able to rip directly to mp4. Apologies.
>
Most disc software will rip to multiple formats.
>
Xocyll
You can also use ffmpeg if you need to convert it after ripping.
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K
Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K