Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install

Liste des GroupesRevenir à csipg action 
Sujet : Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install
De : Xocyll (at) *nospam* gmx.com (Xocyll)
Groupes : comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Date : 26. Jun 2025, 08:05:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <s8sp5ktb2cphvshk26q61bisdkn4vua75b@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Forte Agent 2.0/32.640
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:

On 6/24/2025 2:29 AM, Xocyll wrote:
JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:
 
On 23/06/2025 18:25, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
Twenty years ago, I was all on the side of 'build your own' but these
days? You get almost the same cost/value benefit from OEMs, and a lot
more ease of use. I still like tinkering and building my own rigs, but
I get value from_that_ and don't really see it in the end-product
itself while playing games.
>
Personally I still build (well I like to say assemble as build sounds
far to grand for what you actually do) my own and it probable does save
me money as I can reuse parts and do minor refreshes when required. It
also means I don't end up with LED's everywhere!
 
I don't mind the LEDs, as long as I don't have to pay extra.
In fact my ram has bloody lights on it as do the fans I bought, simply
because it would have cost more to get em without (the fans were on
clearance at 1/3rd normal price, and they're basic red lighting not
rainbow and don't look bad with a black case.)
 
Generally though I say go with an OEM/pre-built mainly because most
people don't have the expertise (or confidence) to either select the
parts or put them together. The latter part isn't hard if you have some
knowledge but lots of people (I'd imagine the norm by far) don't even
have that minimum.
 
I've always said that assembling a computer is about as hard as playing
with LEGOs (and I started saying that back in the days when everything
had a jumper to set.)
Unfortunately, there exist in the world, people who would be incapable
of playing with LEGOs.
 
I remember going around a friend of my better half's house to help him
with his PC. I don't know what he had done but a best guess was he tried
to remove the DVI cable from PC not realising that you have to undo the
screws first, it wasn't pretty.
 
Oh look, you found one of the LEGO challenged.
 
Now imagine him changing his brake pads.
 
There is a term for that.  "Evolution in Action."

I thought it was "scene in Michael Bay movie."

Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Jun 25 * World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install24Praetor Mandrake
21 Jun 25 `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install23Xocyll
21 Jun 25  +* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install11Spalls Hurgenson
22 Jun 25  i+* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Praetor Mandrake
23 Jun 25  ii`- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1candycanearter07
8 Jul 25  i`* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install8Spalls Hurgenson
9 Jul 25  i `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install7JAB
10 Jul 25  i  `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install6candycanearter07
10 Jul 25  i   `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install5Spalls Hurgenson
11 Jul 25  i    +* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install3Xocyll
11 Jul 25  i    i`* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Spalls Hurgenson
12 Jul 25  i    i `- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1Xocyll
14 Jul 25  i    `- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1candycanearter07
22 Jun 25  `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install11Praetor Mandrake
23 Jun 25   `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install10Xocyll
23 Jun 25    `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install9Spalls Hurgenson
23 Jun 25     +- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1Xocyll
24 Jun 25     `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install7JAB
24 Jun 25      `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install6Xocyll
24 Jun 25       +* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Dimensional Traveler
26 Jun 25       i`- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1Xocyll
25 Jun 25       `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install3JAB
26 Jun 25        `* Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install2Xocyll
26 Jun 25         `- Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install1JAB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal