Re: Borderlands 4 justifies its contentious price with one must-have feature

JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:

On 02/07/2025 18:58, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

It must be fun working in the Gearbox PR dept. where you wake up every
morning thinking, what has he done now.

I just assume they are awoken by a TOS era red alert klaxon and flashing
lights.
>
Randy Alert, Randy Alert ...!

He also queried fans about whether making the next Borderlands game a
platform exclusive (without specifying the platform) was something
they should aspire to. Fans were not pleased with the notion.
 
As PC Gamer suggested, somebody needs to take away his phone. But I
think CEOs like him think that ANY publicity is good publicity... and
that anything that comes out of their mouth is worth listening to.

>
What sort of mindset would make you think that gamers would aspire to
having a platform exclusive game. Normally I'd say this game was just ok
but as there's lots of people that can't play it I now find it really
good, I mean seriously?

Forgetting already?

The idea that a PC Exclusive game is a game done right for PC, not
compromised by the inferior controls/input/memory size/etc of a console.

Tiny graphic cell size, popup radial menus, etc;  Hallmarks of a game
designed for console limitations, then forced on PC players unchanged.
Who needs radial menus on a PC with 104 keys, not 6 or whatever it is
consoles have?

Designed for all platforms really means designed for the worst of them
and forced on everyone.

Hell yeah, bring back PC exclusive games!

Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr