Re: And Spalls thinks COD is shallow

"Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby" <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> looked up from
reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good,
the signs say:

Xocyll wrote:

Rin Stowleigh <rstowleigh@x-nospam-x.com> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
 

>
Yeah?  Really?
>
Put a squirrelly little GenZ'er on the problem who has never seen a
gym in his life, trigger his autistic detail reflex and see where that
gets you.... huh?  huh?
>
http://youtube.com/watch?v=oy9n1bZMR-I

 
In the first minute this video derails.
 
He's looking for craters of nuclear origin, but both sides mostly do
_airbursts_ to reduce the radioactive material generated.

>
You haven't convinced me that every nation does this.  I can understand
America or even Russia doing this, but the lasting damage would be
greater with "groundbursts"? A vindictive nation might not be so
green-conscious. Do you think Iran cares which of the two they conduct
with a nuclear strike, since they have to work so hard just to get the
initial blast?

Iran doesn't have nukes now, they sure as hell didn't have them 60 years
ago which is around the time Fallout's War happened.

Cold War = USA vs USSR and they do airbursts since a) it's more
effective at spreading damage and b) you cannot occupy territory and
finally "win" the war of ideologies when said territory kills you.

Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr